components and the second term represents the high
There is no rule for selecting the best level of resolution.
frequency components of the signal (Mallat 1998).
In general, the choice is based on a priori knowledge of
In the context of crosstalk analysis, the signal in the
the signal. In our simulations, decomposition levels 2 and
disturbed line may be decomposed accordingly to (6) and
3 lead to the best results. Notice that the analysis was
the detail coefficients are analysed to get some
done on a decimated version of the original signal
information about the source line of disturbance. The
generated by XFDTD simulator by a factor of 10 because
mean energy of the detail coefficients of the wavelet
it is unnecessary to take all samples.
decomposition provides a characterization of the source
of disturbance and can be used to estimate the distance
from the disturbed line to the source of disturbance.
,9 6,08/$7,21 5(68/76
In this section, we give examples which apply the
proposed approach based on a wavelet decomposition to
crosstalk analysis. The configuration used in the
simulation is that shown in figure 1 and the crosstalk were
generated by means of XFDTD simulation program. In
the first example, a trapezoidal source voltage with a rise
time W = 0.25 QV, a frequency I = 250 0+] and a duty
cycle δ = 0.5 was applied. A trapezoidal waveform with a
rise time W = 2.5 QV, a frequency I = 50 0+] and a duty
cycle δ = 0.5 is propagating down the disturbed line. In
(a)
addition, it is assumed that the source voltage and the
signal propagating down the disturbed line have the same
phase. The wavelet decomposition of the undisturbed
trapezoidal signal at level 2 using Daubechies wavelet of
order 2 (db2) leads to a set of detail coefficients that are
equal to zero except those corresponding to an abrupt
change of the signal (Figure 5). For different tracks
separations, the detail coefficients of the disturbed signal
are shown in Figure 6. As seen, disturbance has
introduced nonzero detail coefficients that have a
magnitude comparable to the undisturbed signal. As the
separation between the coupled lines increases, the
magnitude of detail coefficients decreases. Thus, by
analysing detail coefficients one can get an estimation of
the distance separating the coupled line. As a
(b)
characterization of the perturbation, the mean energy of
detail coefficients may be used. As shown in Figure 7, the
(
variation of the mean energy of the detail coefficients
follows a roughly linear curve and then, one can uses this
energy to estimate the distance from the disturbed line to
the source of disturbance.
)
c)
LJXUH Detail coefficients of the disturbed
signal at level 2 using db2 wavelet for different
values of the separating distance V. (a) V = 1 PP.
(b) V = 5 PP. (c) V = 10 PP.
)LJXUH Detail coefficients
of
the
undisturbed signal at level 2.