3224
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 52, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2004
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6. Measured VSWR of antenna in free space and integrated on laptop for
.
and (b)
the reconfigured radiation configurations (a)
Fig. 5. (a) Measurement setup including scattering objects (not to scale, actual
positions differ slightly). (b) and (c) Measured free space radiation patterns
of the antenna in the plane of interest for the principle polarization of the
reconfigured radiation and reconfigured frequency configurations, respectively.
a comprehensive comparison of integration position, measure-
ments in the azimuthal plane of laptop have been provided in
the following sections. Elevation measurements of the laptop
were also performed, but only in the environments without
scattering objects and are not shown here since the EVS was
performed using incoming waves at azimuth relative to the
laptop computer. Elevation measurements do indicate the same
general kinds of chassis effects illustrated in the azimuthal
measurements.
Fig. 7. Measured azimuthal radiation patterns for reconfigured radiation
configurations
and
with horizontal polarization. (a), (b), and (c)
Measurements taken on the dielectric work surface with no scattering objects
A. Performance of Reconfigured Radiation Configurations
at positions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. (d) Measurement on the dielectric work
surface with the addition of scattering objects for position 4.
1) Shared Bandwidth: For the reconfigured radiation con-
figurations the effects of placement on the antenna's perfor-
loss of 12 MHz in shared bandwidth, indicating that the antenna
mance in terms of the shared bandwidth are addressed first.
may not be able to support the currents needed for the desired
Fig. 6 shows the VSWR of reconfigured radiation configura-
reconfigurability in those positions. The 2:1 VSWR bandwidths
and
(horizontally polarized with respect to the
tions,
for these configurations demonstrate that the antenna is affected
laptop). For the free space and integrated antenna positions 1,
as the integration position changes, and appears to be affected
2, 3, and 4, the shared 2:1 VSWR bandwidths between the
more in positions with low electromagnetic visibility.
(base) and
(reconfigured radiation) configurations are: 50,
2) Radiation Characteristics: The effects of integration po-
50, 54, 50, and 38 MHz, respectively. Although the bandwidths
sition on radiation characteristics are examined next for the
of the antenna are somewhat shifted, positions 1 and 3 show
reconfigured radiation modes. Fig. 7 contains the azimuthal
no appreciable loss in shared bandwidth. In position 2 there is a
radiation patterns for the antenna with reconfigured radiation
shared bandwidth increase of 4 MHz, and in position 4 there is a